Category: Hardware


As the world’s various media outlets start talking breathlessly about how dangerous UPNP is anyone who has talked to me(every one of my clients knows about this) I’ve always maintained UPNP was a huge security hole.  I’ve seen Microsoft among others talk about how it’s not a security threat to allow something inside your network to automatically open holes into your firewall without the network admin’s knowledge.  me and others(like Stever Gibson0 have been vindicated once again.  UPNP has ALWAYS been a a hackers dream…it just took someone a while to prove to the rest of the world what the security guys have been saying base on common sense for years now.  Everyone NEEDS to test their routers now.  You can do it here.  if you fail the test please contact ECC immediately.  Sophos  explains the danger in this blog post.

Tens of millions of network-enabled devices including routers, printers, media servers, IP cameras, smart TVs and more can be attacked over the Internet because of dangerous flaws in their implementation of the UPnP Universal Plug and Play protocol standard, security researchers from Rapid7 said Tuesday in a research paper.UPnP allows networked devices to discover each other and automatically establish working configurations that enable data sharing, media streaming, media playback control and other services. In one common scenario a file-sharing application running on a computer can tell a router via UPnP to open a specific port and map it to the computer’s local network address in order to open its file-sharing service to Internet users.UPnP is intended to be used primarily inside local networks. However, security researchers from Rapid7 found over 80 million unique public IP Internet Protocol addresses that responded to UPnP discovery requests over the Internet, during scans performed last year from June to November.

via Researcher: UPnP flaws expose millions of networked devices to remote attacks | PCWorld.

So Apple got a billion or two from Samsung in court and Apple just effectively paid half that back due to Samsung jacking up component prices to Apple.  Sweet justice.

 

Market-Ticker – MarketTicker Forums.

Microsoft Surface can not compete against real tablet | SemiAccurate.

Scenario is that you have external Hard Drive that you were using in Mac OS X as perhaps a Time Machine backup drive and you now want to erase this drive in Windows. But you find that you cannot remove the 200MB EFI System partition. Here is how:1On the command prompt type diskpart and answer to any possible UAC prompt.2On the new diskpart prompt, type list disk. Note the Disk Number column.3 Type, select disk no. with no. being the partition you wish to delete. Usually partition 0 and with those 200 MB of size4 Finish by typing, clean.This should only take a short moment and it will be complete. There is no message letting you know this has been done. Just quit from the command prompt after a moment.You should have a fresh hard drive ready for format and Windows use.

via Daniel Bs Tech Blog: Remove EFI Partition in Windows 7.

Your vendors card reader taken over by a rogue credit card.  I’ve seen this on tv but never thought it was for real.  This is why i constantly tell folks to update EVERYTHING they can…even card readers now are computers running..Linux.  However there was a vulnerability in the app for the reader which allowed any firmware update to be installed… without checking for authenticity.  Simply swiping a card told the reader to go download a new reader software that not only read the cards but also sent the data to the thieves at this large chain.

 

Thieves Hack Barnes & Noble Point-of-Sale Terminals at 63 Stores | Threat Level | Wired.com.

If Microsoft really plans to get into the mobile space(and Win8 is all about tablets) this is not the way to do it.  $600 bucks for a tablet isn’t going to fly when Andriod and Ipads are already established with superior featuresets already.

 

For a while there it seemed that Microsoft was going to do something spectacular which was going to give Android and Apple a real kicking and establish itself as a leader in the tablet market.

The rumour had been that Vole was going to release a subsidised Windows RT tablet for about $300 which was practically a giveaway. While this would anger hardware makers, it would establish Microsoft’s new operating system and lead to the company becoming a leader in the mobile market.

Unfortunately the rumour was based on the assumption that Microsoft would use common sense and its piles of money to make itself relevant again.

According to Extreme Tech, the rumour mongers had forgotten that Microsoft is a huge elephant of a corporation ruled by competing factions and overseen by Steve Ballmer. So far it has yet to come up with anything that is responsive or innovative to push itself into the mobile market.

Now, a leak has confirmed that Microsoft’s inability to come up with a decent business plan to deal with mobile is about to snatch another defeat from the jaws of victory.

A leaked slide from Asus says that its Vivo Tab RT, due to be released alongside Windows RT at the end of October, will start at $600.

This is more expensive than the iPad 3, and a full $200 more than the iPad 2 or Galaxy Tab 2 10.1. So to be competitive it should have some insane hardware specs – right?

Er, no. The Vivo Tab RT has a low-res 10.1-inch 1366×768 IPS display, quad-core Tegra 3 SoC, 2GB of RAM, NFC, 8-megapixel camera… and that’s about it.

Basically it is the Android Transformer which can be plugged into a keyboard/battery dock for an extra $200 and a docking station only costs $150.

Microsoft is assuming that people will buy the tablet because it has Windows RT on it. This attitude is rather arrogant because it forgets that people are doing rather nicely thank-you-very-much with their Android machines and do not really need Windows.

Vole is basically charging what it always does with its licences, and has no plans to relax the “Windows Tax” to push itself into the mobile market.

via Microsoft prepares to stuff up tablet plans – Asus leak shows Vole’s own goal | TechEye.

So Iphone is stil behind the competition in many ways.  Plus you get locked into doing it Apple’s way or no way.  No thanks.  pricing is ok abut I can get my nexus for $99 and an s3 for less than 200 both with features not found in ithingies.  Apple is no longer innovating..they are following Samsung and HTC.  No wonder they are becoming more like Microsoft and trying to sue their competition instead of innovating.  Iphon5 + refreshed Iphone4..etc etc etc.  When Apple comes out with something new i’ll see about it again.

 

iPhone 5 Brings Size and Speed – Ina Fried – Mobile – AllThingsD.

With Apple now trying to sue it’s competitors out of business Apple is having to play catch up to many Android competitors.  let’s hope the Iphone 5 is a truly game changer…i’m not so sure.  I’ll post my opinions once i’ve seen the entire announcement.

 

iPhone 5: 10 Rumored Features You’ll Already Find in Competing Devices – Mobile and Wireless – News & Reviews – eWeek.com.

I mentioned in an earlier post about how Quickbooks ties many accountants to Windows.  Well I’ve found a partial yet money-saving workaround.  We leverage virtualization even more but not in the typical way.  Instead of setting up a NAS/DAS/SAN you run it off local stoarge.  For SMB’s this saves on costs both short and long run.  Allow me to explain:

First you need to figure out exactly how many of your employees actually do work inside of Quickbooks at the same time.  Not on the same files at the same time but how many of them actually are actively using Quickbooks at the same time.  I bet it’s not even half of your employees.  For the sake of math let’s say you have 15 employees.  Here’s what you do next:

You buy a new virtualization host server.  You then fire up only that amount of windows virtual machines on that server.   Once that is done you then convert all machines to Linux.  Providing printing is solved(which it can be) you only need to pay for 7 windows licenses and 7 Quickbooks licenses.  Considering Linux is free your software costs hit the floor and then burrow underneath it..:)  Now instead of constantly replacing hardware to put up with QB and windows bloat you just let them sit on the virtual machines.  Your hardware lasts longer due to not needing to be replaced every 3-5 years for the latest windows environment cycle and you buy much less software.  of course if your cloudy apps hammer your cpu that’s where individual cpu (maybe motherbaords too)upgrades come into play(aka whiteboxes anyone?).  I’m not going to go into specifics on how i would build my vm host for this..if you want to know contact me for a discussion and quote.

 

 

This is what i thought.  A jury in Silicon Valley with bias towards Apple(seeing Jobs as nearly a deity) has now been seen by their own words as stepping outside the bounds of not only their instructions but also of their own “expertise”.  this jury verdict would be tossed on those grounds alone.  Samsung…if their lawyers rate their bar certifications) should also be able to get this tossed on the ignoring of prior art.  this verdict was bogus from the beginning in many(but not all areas) and it looks like it was done only to keep Apple’s ‘reality distortion field” intact.

 

One of the jurors, Manuel Ilagan, said it only took a day to decide that Samsung had wronged Apple. But it could not decide about the prior art issues, which was a corner stone of Samsung’s defence. The jury decided that these “prior art” issues were getting in the way of letting Apple win.

This was where Hogan stepped in and solved the problem with his experience of patents. Before he did so the jury was having trouble believing that there wasn’t something out there before Apple. However Hogan’s answer was to ignore prior art and focus on the patent and whether Samsung had broken it.

As Hogan said to Bloomberg when he got into the case he started looking at the patents as if they were his and how he could defend them. This is not normally the way you try a court case. If that were the case a jury would be asked to imagine they are the victim and you have to come up with a way to lock your accused up.

Ilagan said that it meant that the jury could go faster as all this prior art nonsense was bogging the jury down. The jury’s inhouse experts did not have to decide if Apple invented the rounded rectangle, it just had to work out if Samsung had made a rounded rectangle.

Reuters quoted Hogan as saying that the jury wanted to send a message to Samsung which was not just a slap on the wrist.

“We wanted to make sure it was sufficiently high to be painful, but not unreasonable.”

He claimed that the jurors could decide on these matters because a few had engineering and legal experience, which helped with the complex problems in play.

Now the main problem with his quote was it means that the jury was wilfully ignoring the jury instructions. It was written there that damages are not supposed to punish, merely to compensate for losses. It seems that the jury did not read them because a few of them considered themselves experts.

via Comment: Apple versus Samsung verdict was a complete mess – Jury ignored prior-art | TechEye.