Category: Vendors


AVG scored in the top 5 again.  This is the reason i’ve partnered with AVG as recently their products have garnered consistent top 5 scores while costing much less and while being much less invasive than other products.  AVG has come quite a way since their arrival a while back.  I’m hoping they will continue to be as lightweight as they have been in the past.

 

AVG’s scores are here.

Norton’s scores are here

Trend Micro’s scores are here

McAfee’s scores are here.

 

AV-TEST – The Independent IT-Security Institute: Test Reports.

…………….. let’s look closely at the facts around the Flashback Trojan causing all this consternation, and clear up what it is versus what it is not, and put the results of the incident in perspective.

Yes it’s true that some 600,000 Macs are confirmed to have been infected. The claim, first made by Dr. Web, an outfit I had never heard of, has since been corroborated by Kaspersky Labs, whose research and analysis capabilities are well-respected. More than half of the compromised machines are in the U.S., 95,000 in Canada, 47,000 in the U.K., and 41,000 in Australia.

The trojan targets a vulnerability in software that is not even an Apple product: Java. You’ll recall that Java is add-on software created by Sun Microsystems and now the property of the software giant Oracle. Rather common, it is no longer shipped as a default add-on to Apple’s Mac OS X beginning in 2011, when Apple first shipped Lion.

Through this hole in Java, certain Web sites are serving up malicious Java applets. Once inserted on the machine, the software then prompts the user to enter the password they use to run the machine. It attempts to trick the user by appearing as an update to Adobe’s Flash video and animation software.

If the user doesn’t fall for the trick, it tries something else. Here again it checks to see if there are any Microsoft Office applications on the machine, or Skype. If there are, it deletes itself.

Then it does something interesting. It scans the contents of the Mac’s hard drive to determine if certain applications are present, and if they are, it deletes itself. Among those applications are security tools such as Little Snitch, a networking security tool, or Packet Peeper, another security tool. It also deletes itself if it sees the user has installed XCode Mac developers tools, and any kind of anti-virus software.

Presuming it finds none of them, it proceeds to contact a command-and-control server for the purpose of downloading and installing more malware. That malware is being used to commandeer the Macs and generate Web traffic to boost revenue for some pay-per-click ads on Web sites, making money for someone who’s behind the scheme. Nothing surprising there.

Apple has issued a fix to Mac OS X that closes the hole in Java, and you can protect yourself by running Software Update from within your machine’s System Preferences. Today would be a good day to do that if you haven’t already. Once you’ve done this you’re no longer vulnerable to the attack.

If you’re among the 600,000 already compromised you can turn to third parties to help you remove it. F-Secure has some instructions here for determining if your machine is affected. If you’re comfortable running some commands in the Mac’s terminal program, there are also some good instructions here at ArsTechnica.

So what does all this say about the state of security on the Mac? Nothing that wasn’t true already. No system is perfectly secure, and this, along with MacDefender, amounts to exactly the second security incident worth mentioning to hit the Mac in about a year. The number of machines affected is less than 1 percent of the 63 million Macs currently in use around the world.

The conventional wisdom has often held that Macs are targeted by malware less often than Windows machines because of their relatively small market share. This still has some merit, but the fact is that Windows is also where the vulnerabilities are. Historically, Mac OS X has been substantially less vulnerable to this sort of thing than Windows.

Does that let Apple off the hook entirely? No, though to its credit, Apple had a fix ready within a week of learning of this vulnerability. That’s not exactly a pokey response, especially when the problem lies not directly within Apple’s software, but in Oracle’s.

via What’s This? A Mac Virus? No Actually It’s a Weakness in Java. – Arik Hesseldahl – News – AllThingsD.

Let’s get one thing straight.  The media, as usual, is not only blowing this out of proportion but also not keying on the right part of the problem.  This is not a Mac issue but a java problem.  Java had and exploit(java itself has become an exploit…much like activex..but worse) that apple didn’t patch as quickly as oracle(the developer of java).  Keep in mind that OSX Lion does not contain java so only folks who forever whatever reason can’t or won’t run the latest Lion release were the only ones vulnerable.  Frankly I banished java from my network a looooong time ago…as the amount of websites that require it for proper operation aren’t enough to even bother with.  How to NOT get infected?  uninstall Java..never install it in the first place.

This means AVG if out of my recommended products until they change this policy.  If you want honest anti-malware protection contact ECC for my recommendations.  if you are a current client and using AVg or avast contact ECC before you contact this vendor.

A call to the support number listed on Avast’s site put me through to a technician named Kishore Chinni; I told Mr. Chinni that I had just installed a copy of Avast, but that I couldn’t be certain it was updating correctly. He asked for a phone number and an email address, and then said the first thing he needed to do was take remote control over my system. He directed me to use Internet Explorer to visit a Web site that requested permission to install two ActiveX add-ons. Those add-ons installed a remote control client called Bogmar Support.

Chinni asked if I had previously installed any antivirus software, and I said I wasn’t sure (I hadn’t). He then fired up the Windows Registry Editor (regedit), poked around some entries, and then opened up the Windows System Configuration Utility (msconfig) and the Windows Event Viewer. Chinni somberly read aloud a few of the entries in the event viewer marked with yellow exclamation points, saying they were signs that my computer could have a problem. He then switched over to the “services” panel of the system configuration tool and noted that the “manufacturer” listing next to avast! antivirus read “unknown.”

“When it says unknown like that, these are warnings that there could be an infection running on the computer,” Chinni explained. He proceeded to install an iYogi “tune up” tool called PCDiagnostics, which tool about 60 seconds to complete a scan of my system. The results showed that my brand new installation of Windows had earned a 73% score, and that it had to detected 17 registry errors and a problem with Windows Update (this was unlikely, as I had already enabled Windows Update and Automatic Updates before I made the support call, and had installed all available security patches). Chinni explained that the “antispyware” warning generated by the PCDiagnostics scan was an indication that a previously installed security software program had not been cleanly removed and was probably causing problems with my computer.

He said another technician could help me with these problems if I wanted. When I inquired whether it would be free, Chinni told me that the company sells support packages for one- to three-year durations, and that the starting price for a support package was $169.99…..

Unfortunately, Avast is not the only security and antivirus firm that has outsourced its support to this company. iYogi also is the support service for AVG, probably Avast’s closest competitor.

via Aghast at Avast’s iYogi Support — Krebs on Security.

It should read…you WILL see a HIGHER chance of billings errors if you go on autopay.  Every time we have tried it there’s ALWAYS been a major error and getting it fixed is worse than pulling teeth.

 

Verizon says users wont have to pay the fee if they enroll in autopay or pay via electronic check. Users on autopay have a higher chance of not seeing bill errors. Thats a real problem given that antiquated and incompatible billing systems have given Verizon a bit of a consumer reputation for math mistakes and billing gaffes with both their landline and wireless products. Verizons not alone in imposing fees just to pay your bill. A significant number of ISPs, including Comcast, now charge users a fee if they want to pay their bill in person or over the phone while speaking either to a real person or automated system

via Pay Verizon Wireless a Fee…To Pay Your Bill – New $2 Convenience Fee Starts January 15 | DSLReports.com, ISP Information.

I got Hyper-v working finally here at my office.  I now have one box hosting 3 virtual mahcines.  VM 1 is my Astaro firewall.  VM 2 is my main AD file/print/authentication server.  VM 3 is my Astaro Command Center which aggregates status and updates from my astaro and my other client installs to me.  This allows me to monitor all of my Astaro easily in one spot without having to constantly individually touch each machine.  My power usage used to idle at nearly 130 watts.  My idle power now hovers around 60 watts.  I now average less than 90 watts which means nearly half of my power budget is now gone.  The host machine is running server 2008 R2 enterprise with Hyper-v.  It has three physical nics.  It also mirrors all functions of the main server except for file serving.

As for resource allocation here is the breakdown:

VM1: 4 vcpus, 2 gigs of ram(static), 3 virtual nics, 80 gigs of dynamic storage on RAID 1, 25% total system cpu ghz reserved with the ability to burst to 50% usage with medium priority.

VM2: 2 vcpus, 2 gigs ram(static), 1 virtual nic, 500 gigs of dynamic storage assigned on it’s own raid 1 array,  0% cpu reservation with burst to 25% cpu with medium priority.

VM3:  4 vcpus, 1 gig ram(static), 1 virtual nic, 120 gigs of dynamic RAID 1 storage, 0% cpu reservation with burst to 25%.

 

Right now the host machine spends most of it’s time at idle.  Considering how little power this draws it will pay for itself in under 1 year.

 

I currently have two virtualization projects going.  One is to convert 3 physical server to hyper-v and one is to convert 3 physical servers to KVM.  Unfortunately p2v on a domain controller is not only not recommended, it doesn’t work well.  Also there is no supported upgrade path from server foundation to anything but standard.  I have foundation and enterprise.  So I am firing up a new enterprise vm and then will manually mount the vhd from foundation backup to grab the files.  It’ll be a permissions nightmare for a bit but i’m used to that..:)  Once i get my AD domain migrated then it is time for Astaro.  Then i decom two boxes saving myself 200 watts of continuous draw.  The draw goes down to about 60 watts.  Keep watching for the KVM conversion.  That one is going to be easier.

Ecc’s site(among others hosted here) has been spontaneously rebooting randomly over the past couple of days.  The server is hosted by Swift Systems in Frederick and finally ECC and Swift personnel had to swap the drives into another identically configured server to try to stabilize things.  It turns out there is some kind of hardware failure with the other machine because it’s been three hours of intensive testing and this replacement machine has not fallen over.  I would like to apologize to anyone who tried to get here and could not during on of the outages.  Swift Systems personnel went above and beyond in trying to figure out what was going on and I am grateful for their help in fixing this issue.

I just passed the Astaro Certified Administrator course.  The next one is the Astaro Certified Engineer.  These will help further my status and abilities as an Astaro partner.  These courses I ahve found to be a good use of time and actually add to my knowledge of the Astaro product even though I have been using the Astaro Security Gateway for nearly 10 years…:)

The issue was the licensing server is in Germany and therefore you have to create licenses according to German time..at least that is how it was. They have fixed that issue. The licenses now work as they should..:) There was quite a bit of debate about leaving a local admin account. As usual i’m out on a limb myself…but that’s nothing new..:)

http://www.astaro.org/astaro-gateway-products/hardware-installation-up2date-licensing/37626-my-astaro-horror-story.html