Latest Entries »

AVG scored in the top 5 again.  This is the reason i’ve partnered with AVG as recently their products have garnered consistent top 5 scores while costing much less and while being much less invasive than other products.  AVG has come quite a way since their arrival a while back.  I’m hoping they will continue to be as lightweight as they have been in the past.

 

AVG’s scores are here.

Norton’s scores are here

Trend Micro’s scores are here

McAfee’s scores are here.

 

AV-TEST – The Independent IT-Security Institute: Test Reports.

Microsoft’s “latest and greatest”  isn’t even able to get a larger share than the acknowledged failure that is Vista.  I’ve been telling clients that Windows 7 is a worthy replacement for XP.  Nice to see some independent data to back up my thoughts.

 

 

Operating system market share.

HOW TO FIND OUT IF YOU HAVE BEEN ROOTED:

ls -la /lib64/libkeyutils.so.1.9

rpm -qf /lib64/libkeyutils.so.1.9

ls -la /lib/libkeyutils.so.1.9

rpm -qf /lib/libkeyutils.so.1.9

If you find the file and RPM shows “is not owned by any package” you have been rooted.

Currently known affected OSes:  RHEL-based servers

Currently known effected control panels:  cPanel, DirectAdmin, and Plesk

we do not know if controls panels are the reason or not.

Servers with ksplice have been exploited

via 0day Linux/CentOS SSHd Spam Exploit — libkeyutils.so.1.9 | Security, Server Tweaking, IT Management Blog By SolidShellSecurity.

As the world’s various media outlets start talking breathlessly about how dangerous UPNP is anyone who has talked to me(every one of my clients knows about this) I’ve always maintained UPNP was a huge security hole.  I’ve seen Microsoft among others talk about how it’s not a security threat to allow something inside your network to automatically open holes into your firewall without the network admin’s knowledge.  me and others(like Stever Gibson0 have been vindicated once again.  UPNP has ALWAYS been a a hackers dream…it just took someone a while to prove to the rest of the world what the security guys have been saying base on common sense for years now.  Everyone NEEDS to test their routers now.  You can do it here.  if you fail the test please contact ECC immediately.  Sophos  explains the danger in this blog post.

Tens of millions of network-enabled devices including routers, printers, media servers, IP cameras, smart TVs and more can be attacked over the Internet because of dangerous flaws in their implementation of the UPnP Universal Plug and Play protocol standard, security researchers from Rapid7 said Tuesday in a research paper.UPnP allows networked devices to discover each other and automatically establish working configurations that enable data sharing, media streaming, media playback control and other services. In one common scenario a file-sharing application running on a computer can tell a router via UPnP to open a specific port and map it to the computer’s local network address in order to open its file-sharing service to Internet users.UPnP is intended to be used primarily inside local networks. However, security researchers from Rapid7 found over 80 million unique public IP Internet Protocol addresses that responded to UPnP discovery requests over the Internet, during scans performed last year from June to November.

via Researcher: UPnP flaws expose millions of networked devices to remote attacks | PCWorld.

How lovely.  It is one thing to leave backdoors but to make them so insecure is inexcusable.  If you value security yank these devices and start hammering barracuda to fix their vulnerabilities.

 

A variety of the latest firewall, spam filter and VPN appliances sold by Campbell, Calif. based Barracuda Networks Inc. contain undocumented backdoor accounts, the company disclosed today. Worse still, while the backdoor accounts are apparently set up so that they would only be accessible from Internet addresses assigned to Barracuda, they are in fact accessible to potentially hundreds of other companies and network owners.

Barracuda’s hardware devices are broadly deployed in corporate environments, including the Barracuda Web Filter, Message Archiver, Web Application Firewall, Link Balancer, and SSL VPN. Stefan Viehböck, a security researcher at Vienna, Austria-based SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab., discovered in November 2012 that these devices all included undocumented operating system accounts that could be used to access the appliances remotely over the Internet via secure shell (SSH).

Viehböck found that the username “product” could be used to login and gain access to the device’s MySQL database (root@localhost) with no password, which he said would allow an attacker to add new users with administrative privileges to the appliances. SEC Consult found a password file containing a number of other accounts and hashed passwords, some of which were uncomplicated and could be cracked with little effort.

Viehböck said he soon found that these devices all were configured out-of-the-box to listen for incoming SSH connections on those undocumented accounts, but that the devices were set to accept connection attempts only from Internet address ranges occupied by Barracuda Networks. Unfortunately, Barracuda is not the only occupant of these ranges. Indeed, a cursory lookup of the address ranges at network mapping site Robtex.com shows there are potentially hundreds of other companies running Web sites and other online operations in the same space.

via Backdoors Found in Barracuda Networks Gear — Krebs on Security.

I have a client’s laptop and he has windows 8 on it….of course he hates it.  So i advised either take the laptop back or buy windows 7 and upgrade to Windows 7.  I’ve been trying for a couple of hours just to get into the UEFI in this thing…finally found it in the insanity that is windows 8.  Once i finally got it to boot to the dvd…guess what?  The screen shifts to a red box that says secure boot failed operating system is invalid.  This machine is so locked down YOU CAN’T INSTALL ANYTHING OTHER THAN THE PREINSTALLED WINDOWS 8.      So now my clients have something to think about:

1.  Stick with Windows 8.

2.  Take the machine back

3.  Buy an Apple

4.  Have ecc build you a tower that doesn’t have this crazy lockin.

5. Hope the vendor gave you an option to kill secure boot so you have control of your computer.

 

Luckily in this case i was able to kill secure boot so i could wax the hard drive and put a real operating system on the machine.

 

via Windows 8: The Animated Evaluation – YouTube.

 

I’m going to watch this to see if it is really something to be concerned about or not.  However the e-mail re-infection component has me a bit concerned.  If that’s the case anyone who thinks ANY machine with malware can be cleaned is foolish.  I may have to re-evaluate my malware handling procedures.

 

Researchers have uncovered an ongoing, large-scale computer espionage network that’s targeting hundreds of diplomatic, governmental, and scientific organizations in at least 39 countries, including the Russian Federation, Iran, and the United States.

Operation Red October, as researchers from antivirus provider Kaspersky Lab have dubbed the highly coordinated campaign, has been active since 2007, raising the possibility it has already siphoned up hundreds of terabytes of sensitive information. It uses more than 1,000 distinct modules that have never been seen before to customize attack profiles for each victim. Among other things, components target individual PCs, networking equipment from Cisco Systems, and smartphones from Apple, Microsoft, and Nokia. The attack also features a network of command-and-control servers with a complexity that rivals that used by the Flame espionage malware that targeted Iran.

“This is a pretty glaring example of a multiyear cyber espionage campaign,” Kaspersky Lab expert Kurt Baumgartner told Ars. “We haven’t seen these sorts of modules being distributed, so the customized approach to attacking individual victims is something we haven’t seen before at this level.”

The main purpose of the campaign is to gather classified information and geopolitical intelligence. Among the data collected are files from cryptographic systems such as the Acid Cryptofiler, with the collected information used in later attacks. Stolen credentials, for instance, were compiled and used later when the attackers needed to guess secret phrases in other locations.

Little is known about the people or organizations responsible for the project, and conflicting data makes it hard to attribute the nationality of the attackers. While the malware developers spoke Russian, many of the exploits used to hijack victim computers were initially developed by Chinese hackers. Also clouding the identity of the attackers is the long roster of victims. The Russian Federation was the most targeted country, followed by Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Belgium, India, Afghanistan, Armenia, Iran, and Turkmenistan. In all computers belonging to 39 countries from a variety of continents are infected.

The command-and-control infrastructure that receives the stolen data uses more than 60 domain names as proxy servers to obscure the final destination. These domains are believed to funnel data to a second tier of proxy servers, which in turn are believed to send the information to a “mother ship” that Kaspersky researchers still know little about. The ability of the infrastructure to shield the identity of the attackers and to resist takedown efforts rivals the command-and-control system used by Flame, the espionage malware reportedly developed by the US and Israel to spy on Iran. The Red October malware itself has remained undetected on more than 300 PCs and networks for more than five years.

“It’s been a very-well-maintained and set-up infrastructure that’s supported with multiple levels of proxies in order to hide away the mothership,” Baumgartner said. “They’ve been very effective at cycling through these domains and staying under the radar for the past five years.”

“Foolproof” backdoor

One novel feature contained in Red October is a module that creates an extension for Adobe Reader and Microsoft Word on compromised machines. Once installed, the module provides attackers with a “foolproof” way to regain control of a compromised machine, should the main malware payload ever be removed.

“The document may be sent to the victim via e-mail,” the researchers explained. “It will not have an exploit code and will safely pass all security checks. However, like with exploit case, the document will be instantly processed by the module and the module will start a malicious application attached to the document.”

Red October is also notable for the broad array of devices it targets. Beside PCs and computer workstations, it’s capable of stealing data from iPhones and Nokia and Windows Mobile smartphones, along with Cisco enterprise network equipment. It can also retrieve data from removable disk drives, including files that have already been deleted, thanks to a custom file recovery procedure.

via Massive espionage malware targeting governments undetected for 5 years | Ars Technica.

This has been a long standing procedure.  If you are online and what to have an online identity certificate that identifies you you have been required to go to various third parties(Verisign, GoDaddy just to name two) and pay them to issue you a digital certificate that other folks then accept as being genuinely unique to you.  The problem is…now you have placed the security and authenticity of your online identity in the hands of a third party.  What happens when, not if,  that third party gets hacked?  Your online identity has been compromised and now these digital certificates aren’t worth much now are they?  This philosophy is very counter-intuitive due to the fact in banking we tell clients…you must be careful to not allow your identity to be stolen and we rail against allowing third parties access to your information.  yes for online security we are doing just that?  One of the basics is to NOT trust third parties with your information.  We spent enormous amounts of time and money trying to prevent this very thing as much as possible.  Why are we then spending the same amount of time and money doing just to opposite to verify we are who we say we are when we are talking about the Internet?  If you just look at these two side by side..one is best practices and one is backwards.  If we are going to tell folks self protection and generation is the way to go why do the opposite online?  The RSA company was compromised and now two factor authentication tokens are now all worthless until the RSA generates a new algorithm   Comodo just was compromised by a third party of theirs that then compromised their own certificate database for some very high profile sites.  If you have not updated your browsers(yes all of them) you could now be receiving bad certificates that say they are genuine but aren’t.  Frankly this makes no sense to me.  All a third party has to do is screw up once..and ALL of their clients can be affected.  You then have to do something like update all of your software or redo all of your dongles once that occurs.  I use only self-generated certificates.  That way I know they are genuine and aren’t compromised.  If i get compromised It’s only me.   I don’t see how this reliance on third party for online security is progress.

 

Brian krebs tweet: as w/ this Comodo cert issue and the RSA mess, I’m struck by how many big security threats r beyond user’s ability to do squat about them

comodo incident listing http://www.comodo.com/Comodo-Fraud-Incident-2011-03-23.html

ms advisory on issue http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/2524375.mspx

Steve Gibson on RSA hack http://steve.grc.com/2011/03/19/reverse-engineering-rsas-statement/ follow embedded links too.

This has been building quietly in back rooms for a while and it now coming into the light.  The top 5 US isp’s and the MPAA and others are now coming out with new “anti-piracy” policies   The days of anyone being able to run free wifi are over without any kind of filters are coming to an end.  Verizon isn’t the only one doing this…Comcast and the other 3 largest isp’s have VOLUNTARILY joined in on this as well.  This isn’t even a government thing it is an alliance with the MPAA and others.  Most folks would say,” they are only enforcing copyright”.  That would be the truth if during court proceedings the content providers weren’t filing false accusations, withholding contrary evidence, and most times are just plain wrong about who did what where when.  Verizon’s policy is in the following italicized text.  Please read the linked article for the policies from other ISP’s that are int he pipeline.  If you are a business or an individual offering free wifi you now have to put in the appropriate filters to protect yourself from probable legal action.  Contact ECC for consultation on how to do this.

 

Alert 1 and 2

“Are delivered by email and automatic voicemail to the telephone number we have on file for you. Notify you that one or more copyright owners have reported that they believe your account has been involved in possible copyright infringement activity.”

“Provide a link to information on how to check to see if file sharing software is operating on your computer (and how to remove it) and tell you where to find information on obtaining content legally.”

If more infringements are found after the first two alerts then the account holder is moved on to the acknowledgment phase where “popups” appear on-screen. Customers will have to acknowledge that they received the new alert and will be instructed to watch a video about the consequences of online piracy.

Alert 3 and 4

“Redirect your browser to a special web page where you can review and acknowledge receiving the alerts. Provide a short video about copyright law and the consequences of copyright infringement.”

“Require you to click on an “acknowledgement” button before you will be able to freely browse the Internet. Clicking the acknowledgement button does not require you to admit that you or anyone else actually engaged in any infringing activity, only that you have received the alert.”

If the infringements continue after the fourth alert the subscriber will move on to the mitigation phase. Here, the customer can either ask for a review by the American Arbitration Association or undergo a temporary speed reduction to 256kbps.

Alert 5 and 6

“Redirect your browser to a special web page where you will be given several options. You can: Agree to an immediate temporary (2 or 3 day) reduction in the speed of your Internet access service to 256kbps (a little faster than typical dial-up speed); Agree to the same temporary (2 or 3 day) speed reduction but delay it for a period of 14 days; or Ask for a review of the validity of your alerts by the American Arbitration Association.”

via Verizon’s “Six Strikes” Anti-Piracy Measures Unveiled | TorrentFreak.